Along with the article was a picture, Michael Vick reimagined and digitally altered to be a white man.
Juding from just the headline alone, I was pleased they used proper grammar but disappointed that they were going say Michael Vick was persecuted and punished harshly, because he is black.
Then I read the article: "I'm certain white privilege would not be enough to rescue a white NFL star caught killing dogs."
And it goes on to make the point that separating Vick or any of us from our race would be impossible. If Vick were white, he would have grown up in different circumstances and quite possibly never have been exposed to dogfighting in the first place. Maybe he wouldn't even play football, who knows?
Regardless of color Vick has turned his life around. He seems to be on the straight and narrow and personally, and on the basis of his play on the field he signed a new 6-year, $100m contract with the Eagles. I hope he uses that money to repay his creditors and uses these lessons to live an honest life.
But I will always hate him. No matter what color he is.
I couldn't agree with you more. I don't care about your skin color or upbringing, if you torture and brutally murder an innocent animal you're a piece of garbage.
ReplyDeleteI heard there is a disgusting new practice called "trunking" where dog fighters stuff 2 dogs in the trunk of a car and make them fight to the death. They blast music and drive the car around so police don't know what's happening. Makes me want to vomit.