A pending court case in England may set new guidelines on who is or isn’t a Jew.
Here’s the background:
The U.K. has state sponsored religious schools. A boy known in court as “M” was rejected from the Jews’ Free School because he is not Jewish, at least not according to the school. His mother converted but she did so in a progressive, not an orthodox synagogue, therefore she is not a Jew nor is her son, in the school’s eyes.
His family sued saying the school discriminated against him. They lost the first case but won the appeal when the court said the school’s test of Jewishness needs to be based on religion, which would be legal, instead of on race or ethnicity, which would not. The court ruled that it was an ethnic test because it concerned the status of M’s mother rather than whether M considered himself Jewish and practiced Judaism.
I’m with “M” on this one. I think religion is based on what you feel and what you do. There are lots of Jews, especially in America who are only Jewish because someone a long time ago was Jewish. A student from two traditionally Jewish parents who doesn’t practice Judaism or identify with the Jewish people should have less right and would like derive less benefit from a Jewish education than “M.”
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I just looked into getting Rose Bowl tickets, and an Ohio State golf bag. I mean....who doesn't want an Ohio State golf bag?
Nice...my CAPTCHA is "Sable"...just had a college WWE flashback.
Post a Comment